|
|
|
|
Publications Conferences and Lectures Research Topics Zen Memetics |
|
|
Imagery and the OBE |
|
Blackmore,S.J. 1983 Imagery and the OBE Research in Parapsychology 1982 Ed. W.G.Roll, J.Beloff and R.A.White, Metuchen, N.J., Scarecrow 231-232Paper presented at the 25th
Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association and Centenary
Conference of the Society for Psychical Research, Trinity College,
Cambridge, August 1982
Susan J. Blackmore (Brain and Perception
Laboratory, University of Bristol) Introduction
It has often been suggested that the world of the
out-of-body experience (OBE) is a product of imagery or hallucination.
If so, one would expect those people who have OBEs (OBErs) to have
better controlled or more vivid imagery, or to be more likely to
suffer from other kinds of hallucinations. Several previous studies
have not found the expected relationships with vividness or control of
imagery (H. Irwin, Parapsychology Review, 1981, 12(4), 1-6; S.J.
Blackmore, Beyond the Body, 1982). However, the most
appropriate tests may not have been used in these investigations. In
most OBEs the experient seems to observe things from a location above
his or her normal viewpoint. It may be hypothesized that OBErs should
be more used to imagining things from such a viewpoint. Therefore
subjects were asked about the viewpoint of remembered scenes. In addition, if the OBE world is imagined, then
the ability to “move” by changing the imaginary viewpoint should
be important. Subjects were therefore asked to imagine changing
viewpoints. In this process the manipulation of three-dimensional
shapes is involved and so some subjects were given a Space Relations
test to investigate this ability. Method
A questionnaire was given to 98 psychology
students asking them to imagine from memory six simple scenes. They
were asked whether they imagined each scene as though from eye level
(as they would have seen it at the time), as though from above eye
level, or in some other way. They were also asked how easily they
could switch from one view to another (easily, with difficulty, or not
at all). Other questions included Palmer’s OBE question (JASPR,
1979, 221-252) and questions on visual distortions (see pages
232-234). Those who volunteered were given the Space
Relations Test from the Differential Aptitude Test battery. This
25-minute paper and pencil test measures ability to imagine the
rotation of simple geometrical forms. There was no stated connection
between this and answers to the OBE question. 9 OBErs and 28 non-OBErs
took this test. Results
30, or 31%, of the students reported having had at
least one OBE. Most of these (89%) had had more than one. There were
no significant age or sex differences. The number of scenes imagined
as though from above did not differ between OBErs (mean = 2.57) and
non-OBErs (mean = 2.15, t = 1.23, 95 df, p = .22). However, there was
a difference in reported ability to switch from one view to another (t
= 2.02, 95 df, p = .046). On the Space Relations test OBErs (mean =
46.2) scored higher than non-OBErs (mean = 41.3) but the difference
was not significant (t = 1.32, 36 df, p = .19). Discussion
Two of the hypotheses were not confirmed and the
tests failed to distinguish OBErs from others. The only significant
difference lay in the reported ability to switch from one imaginary
viewpoint to another. This could be important because if the OBE world
is a mental construction then the ability to “move” about in it
may be crucial to the experience. In order to establish this, better
tests of this ability should be devised. Since all the differences
were in the expected directions similar test with larger samples are
planned. Back Home Page created |